Popular Articles

Antipsychotic Drugs Associated With High Blood Sugar In Older Adults With Diabetes
Older patients with diabetes who take antipsychotic medications appear to have an increased risk of hospitalization for hyperglycemia (elevated blood glucose level), especially soon after beginning treatment, according to a report in the July 27 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.
generic viagra online
Gene Variations Can Be Barometer Of Behavior, Choices
Researchers at Brown University and the University of Arizona have determined that variations of three different genes in the brain (called single-nucleotide polymorphisms) may help predict a person"s tendency to make certain choices.
News of the day
Abstinence-Only Movement Seeking Relevancy In Face Of Potential Funding Cuts, Opinion Piece States
Advocates of abstinence-only sex education -- "[w]ell aware that their cause is in trouble and unpopular" -- are "revamping their image to appear more mainstream," Jessica Valenti, author of "The Purity Myth: How America"s Obsession With Virginity Is Hurting Young Women" and editor of the blog Feministing, writes in an opinion piece in The Nation. She writes that "high on the list of priorities" for abstinence-only proponents is "developing a strategy for continuing to receive federal dollars." Although President Obama "has brought some measure of sanity to public health policy" by reducing funding for abstinence-only programs in his fiscal year 2010 budget proposal, "with Obama"s faith-based initiative lending an ear" to abstinence-only proponents, their strategy "might just work," according to Valenti.Valenti writes that abstinence-only proponents have launched what she terms a "virginity movement." Backers of this movement included "antifeminist think tanks," such as the Independent Women"s Forum and Concerned Women for America, as well as abstinence-only groups, religious leaders and certain conservative lawmakers, Valenti says. She adds that the movement "is much more than the same old sexism; it"s a targeted and well-funded backlash hellbent on rolling back women"s rights using modernized notions of purity, morality and sexuality."Valenti continues that the groups" effort includes "appropriating the language and tools of comprehensive sex education and its advocates," while also "attempting to legitimize its message by rebranding itself as science-based." For example, Valerie Huber, executive director of the National Abstinence Education Association, said during a recent Capitol Hill briefing that abstinence-only ""talks about contraception"" and offers ""medically accurate information."" In reality, "the only time abstinence-only classes will talk about contraception is when they discuss failure rates -- often exaggerating those rates or spreading misinformation about the dangers of contraception," Valenti writes.The "good news in all of this" is that most funding for abstinence-only education would be redirected to "teen pregnancy prevention programs" under Obama"s budget plan, Valenti writes. However, the "bad news" is that one-quarter of the money allocated for teen pregnancy prevention in the proposal would be available to abstinence-only programs, and "the language in the budget doesn"t make room for initiatives to curb sexually transmitted infections," she continues. "So while the virginity movement re-evaluates its image and messaging, progressives have to be just as prepared to battle back with renewed energy, with any eye toward legislative and policy gains and toward assuring that these groups don"t regain their cultural footing," Valenti writes.The issue is "about a lot more than bad-faith messages about condoms and pregnancy," she writes. It is "about stopping a movement committed to the regression of women"s rights, enforcing gender norms and teaching America"s youth -- especially young women -- that sexuality is wrong, dirty and dangerous," according to Valenti. She concludes, "Now that there is a new administration in Washington, we need to ensure not only that we hold our leaders accountable but that we direct the national conversation about sex, gender and health" (Valenti, The Nation, 6/17).
Diagnostics

Sen. Tom Daschle, Rep. Jason Altmire, Healthcare Experts Tout Homecare As Cost-Effective Solution In The Healthcare Reform Process

During a roundtable discussion on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and Blue Dog Democrat Rep. Jason Altmire (D-Pa.) stressed the cost-effective role that homecare can play in the reform of the U.S. healthcare system. The roundtable also addressed the controversial competitive bidding program for home medical equipment and services. The American Association for Homecare hosted the event, which was attended by congressional staff and media. Senator Daschle and Representative Altmire were joined in the discussion by Peter Thomas, co-chair of the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities" Health Task Force, and Georgetta Blackburn, vice president for government relations at Blackburn"s, a home medical provider in Tarentum, Pa. Tyler Wilson, president of the American Association for Homecare, moderated the discussion. Senator Tom Daschle noted, "We can provide low-cost good quality access in part through home healthcare. Home health is by far the most effective way to start producing wellness promotion and primary carẹ€¦." Referring to the difference between the $7 per day cost of oxygen therapy to more than $5,000 per day for hospitalization under Medicare, Daschle said the difference "shows clearly how much of a panacea home healthcare can be." "My mother"s quality of life is a hundred times better given the fact that she can live at home rather than be institutionalized at 86. Her quality of life is proof positive that we can help improve quality, lower costs, and provide greater access if we put the emphasis where it belongs: at the base of the pyramid with good home healthcare." Congressman Jason Altmire, a fiscally conservative Blue Dog Democrats in Congress, spoke about the role of home medical services and equipment in healthcare reform. "We"re going to preserve what works in our current system, first and foremost, and one of the things that works best in the current system is homecare. And if you look at what the goals are for healthcare reform, homecare touches on every one of them. When you think about wellness and prevention ̣€¦ that can be done in the home better than anywhere else. There"s no more cost-effective setting than in the home." Altmire referred to findings from hearings on competitive bidding in the House Small Business Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, which he chairs. "What we found is when you have a regulation in place that"s putting cost over quality, that"s not only going to impact the beneficiary, and we all know how that works, it"s also going to affect the small businesses that are staples to our communities in the durable medical equipment field." Peter Thomas, representing the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities, said, "Disability groups have long opposed competitive bidding for DMEPOS [durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies]. There is real concern about limitations on choice of provider. In many instances these are beneficiaries with long-standing relationships with providerṣ€¦. Those relationships get fractured under competitive bidding̣€¦. We"re very concerned that service is going to go out the window, that quality is going to decrease, and that patient choice is going to become compromised. There are other ways to get at overpayment in the DMEPOS fee schedule. We think that competitive bidding is not the way to do it." "Homecare must be supported as a vital component of the healthcare system and recognized as a critical benefit under Medicare," said Tyler Wilson, president of the American Association for Homecare. "When the Office of Inspector General at HHS notes that a piece of equipment can be purchased over the Internet at a lower cost than at the Medicare rate, it presents a false analogy and demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the benefit. Quality homecare and accessible homecare is not merely about equipment. That is not what Medicare beneficiaries want, nor is it the recipe for providing a standard of healthcare that everyone expects. Services include 24-hour on-call service; patient evaluation and education, caregiver education regarding equipment maintenance and safety and infection control; monitoring visits assessing patient compliance with the physician plan of care; ongoing maintenance of the home medical equipment; and ongoing provision of related supplies and back-up systems as needed." In the wake of a 9.5 percent cut effective January 2009 for the most commonly used home medical equipment items and a 27 percent cut to home oxygen reimbursement so far in 2009, and the Association is urging Congress to enact budget-neutral reform of medical oxygen policy to make the Medicare benefit more patient focused, refrain from additional cuts, and enact a 13-point plan to dramatically reduce abuse and fraud in Medicare. The American Association for Homecare


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):